
The leading concentric eddy current separator is not just a new piece of equipment. This is a solution that we have implemented at three Russian mining and processing plants over the past 18 months. In each case, it replaced two-stage filters and centrifuges, reducing energy consumption by 37% and eliminating 92% of downtime due to filter element clogging. That's exactly how it worksleading concentric eddy current separator- no moving parts, no regular replacement of consumables, no loss of productivity as contamination increases.
We observed the same picture: at processing plants where ore with a high content of clay impurities and fine iron is processed, traditional separators quickly lose their throughput. Filters clog within 4–6 hours. Centrifuges require daily maintenance. Electromagnetic traps have a weak effect for particles smaller than 15 microns. The problem is not the quality of the equipment - it is the physics of the process. Standard vortex devices create an unstable field, and their eccentric geometry causes secondary vortex and recirculation of contaminants.
The concentric design solves this radically. The flow axis coincides with the magnetic field axis. The liquid moves in a spiral with a constant radius of curvature. Particles under the influence of the Lorentz force are deflected strictly to the periphery - without “loops”, without reverse flows, without loss of time for restructuring the flow. We measured the settling rate in the laboratory: for Fe₃O₄ particles of 5-8 μm in size, the separation time was reduced from 3.2 seconds to 0.47 seconds.
Three technical solutions proven in operation:
These parameters are not stated in the catalog - they are recorded in the commissioning test reports at the Ural Mining and Processing Plant, where the equipment has been operating for 14 months without a single case of emergency shutdown.
Some customers believe: “the higher the induction, the better.” This is a dangerous misconception. When induction exceeds 2.1 T, parasitic magnetization of pipelines begins, heating of the housing increases, and energy consumption increases sharply. We saw a case where a similar separator of a different brand failed after 5 weeks - due to overheating of the power cable insulation under incorrectly calculated conditions.
The correct approach is to start by analyzing the composition of the suspension. We need not only the size of the particles, but also their magnetic susceptibility, shape (spherical/needle-shaped), and distribution by fraction. Only after this we select the optimal combination: chamber diameter (from 80 to 320 mm), frequency, gradient and internal coating material (Al₂O₃ ceramics or SiC-based composite).
Another common mistake is ignoring the supply conditions. The inlet pressure must be stable within ±0.15 bar. Changes cause “pulsation” of the vortex and reduce the degree of purification by 18–22%. We always include a calculation of hydraulic resistance in the project and recommend installing a damper in front of the separator.
In practice, the payback period is from 7 to 11 months. The calculation is based on three articles:
LONGI Corporation has been designing, manufacturing and certifying such separators since 1993. The Fushun plant covers an area of 140,000 m² and produces more than 4,000 units annually. More than 60% of engineers have university degrees in mining and electromagnetism. Each batch is tested at pressures up to 2.5 MPa and temperatures up to 85 °C. Full technical specifications, connection diagrams and calculation examples are available on the websiteljmagnet.ru.
The leading concentric eddy current separator is not an upgrade to an existing approach. This is a transition to a fundamentally new level of control over the quality of process fluids. It works where other methods have run out of resources. And it continues to work - without failures, without loss of efficiency, without compromise.